My blog at the YA for Obama site is up today. I have to say that in the time since I wrote that, a lot has happened (like the economic crisis! and the will-we-won’t-we-debate debate), and my inner cynic has been nursed back to health. I hate campaigns, especially in these last weeks before the election. I would like to vote today. But I’m trying to hang in there! And now…
This is so not like me and I would rather avoid this altogether, but I know a lot of my friends, fans, and family are pro-life and I feel like I need to say something here about one of the big sticking points a lot of Christians have when it comes to Obama (and most of the Democratic party): abortion. I saw a comment on another writer-for-Obama’s blog that said if all us writers claim to be “for children,” how could we support a candidate that voted against a ban of partial birth abortion? I know there’s no answer that’s going to be satisfying. And I admit that Obama hasn’t voted the way I might like every time on this issue. I am pro-life, but in the context of 21st century life in a pluralistic democracy where the horse is already out of the barn, I am also pro-choice.
And I want to say a little bit about the big picture, which is how I view what it means to be pro-life. In a perfect pro-life utopia there would be no war. There would be no torture. No child abuse, no hunger, no homelessness, no terrorism, and yes, no abortion. The lives of unborn children and Iraqi citizens and American soldiers, villagers in Darfur, Katrina victims, the homeless, addicted, mentally ill would all have equal value. We would have a society where, when faced with an unplanned pregnancy, a woman would see many good options in the world in front of her that would make bringing the baby into that world seems not only possible, but desirable. We would have a society where all needs were met - through government programs, faith-based programs, community action, personal accountability, or, hopefully, all of the above. When I was talking about this with my mom, she said, “But I don’t understand why we have to have trade-offs among beneficiaries of a pro-life position.” She makes a good point. I hate the either/or nature of politics. “They are for programs, but we are for personal accountability.” “They are pro-life, but we will try to bring an end to the war.” Why can’t we have it all? In our hypothetical utopia, we wouldn’t have to choose one thing at the expense of the other. However, at this moment in history, my opinion is that Obama and the Democrats are more likely to better address more of the issues in a truly pro-humanity way. It is a far less than ideal situation. I know that. But as I said in a recent post, voting usually involves making some kind of compromise. Except now I wouldn’t say “usually,” now I would say “always.”
I never ever wanted my blog to be political, and I am already so tired of this, and I don’t enjoy talking about politics, like, at all. But I know that my participation in YA for Obama kind of forces me out of the closet here and that’s probably good for me. Now that I’ve written this, when anyone asks me about the Obama/abortion issue, I can just direct them here. I don’t want to have a debate. Honestly, I’m never convinced enough of my own rightness to get into a debate. I am all too aware that at any given moment, I could be wrong, so I take everything I say with a grain of humility.
All of this YA for Obama stuff is really going to enhance the discussion I’m leading at the Kidlit Blogger conference this weekend! I’ll be talking about balancing the personal and professional (and now political) on your author blog.